Case of McCann and others verses the United Kingdom.
Read Online
Share

Case of McCann and others verses the United Kingdom. by European Court of Human Rights.

  • 2 Want to read
  • ·
  • 57 Currently reading

Published by European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg .
Written in English

Subjects:

  • Farrell, Mairead.,
  • Savage, Sean.,
  • Daniel, McCann.

Book details:

The Physical Object
Pagination68p. ;
Number of Pages68
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL17376427M

Download Case of McCann and others verses the United Kingdom.

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

Case of McCann and Others v. the United kingdom (17///) - judgment. (Book, ) [] Your list has reached the maximum number of items. Please create a new list with a new name; move some items to a new or existing list; or delete some items. Your request to send this item has been completed. CASE OF McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (A p p l i ca t i o n n o. 1 8 9 8 4 / 9 1) JU D G M E N T S T R A S B O U R G 2 7 S e p t e m b e r 1 9 9 5 In the case of McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom. CASE OF McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM , [for details on the background, you may skim ]. Get McCann v. United Kingdom, 21 E.H.R.R. 97 (), European Court of Human Rights, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.

McCann and Others v. United Kingdom, Series A, No , Application No /91(). Facts: The applicants are parents of the victims who were shot dead by members of the Special Air Service, a regiment of the British Army which was expecting a terrorist attack by the investigation began but certain information was not disclosed. "McCann and ors v United Kingdom, Judgment, Merits and Just Satisfaction, App No /91, Case No 17///, A/, [] E () 21 E IHRL (ECHR ), 27th September , European Court of Human Rights [ECHR]; Grand Chamber [ECHR]" published on by Oxford University Press. In the case of McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom (1), The European Court of Human Rights, sitting, pursuant to Rule 51 of Rules of Court A (2), as a Grand Chamber composed of the following judges: Mr R. Ryssdal, President, Mr R. Bernhardt,,, Mr C. Russo, Mr A. Spielmann, Mr N. Valticos, Mrs E. Palm, Mr R. Pekkanen, Mr J.M. Morenilla. Four years later, in November , the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom () and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom ().

  McCann v The United Kingdom: ECHR 13 May References: /04, [] ECHR It rejected the government’s argument that the reasoning in Connors was to be confined only to cases involving the eviction of gipsies or cases where the applicant sought to challenge the law itself rather than its application in his particular case. ECtHR - Stewart v. the United Kingdom, Application no. /82, 10 July ECtHR - James and Others v. the United Kingdom, App No /79, 21 February ECtHR - The Holy Monasteries v.   Applied – Kay And Others v United Kingdom ECHR (Bailii, [] ECHR , /06) (Fourth Section) After carefully considering the various views expressed in the House of Lords in Kay v Lambeth [] 2 AC and Doherty v Birmingham [] 1 AC , and the relevant decisions of the Court of Appeal, the EurCtHR stated, at paras. A selection of key paragraph(s) can be found below the document. The Court considers that the exceptions delineated in paragraph 2 (art. ) indicate that this provision (art. ) extends to, but is not concerned exclusively with, intentional killing. As the Commission has pointed out, the text of Article 2 (art. 2), read as .